The other peace settlements at the end of the 1st World War

To score two countries in a outdo of 1 to 5 is non an easy thing. When you score something it mostly depends on which side you atomic number 18. For ensample if you are a citizen of a defeated nation, you wont agree with the agreement at all, because you dont want your unsophisticated to be smaller, you dont want your country to loose power But as you had no choice then to accept that cruel treaty, youll of origin ring its actually UNFAIR And if you are a citizen of a new created state or a state that gain benefits from the defeated nations, youll agree with the treaty, for example Czech citizen capacity be VERY happy of the treaties, because the Czechoslovakia were created. If there werent any treaty, therell be no CzechFor me as a foreigner (China), Im looking at an outside way. I dont agree with the treaty As your question asked, I can choose any two treaties of the quaternion treaties, but its for nothing, because I think all four treaties are unfair Ill give 5 to all the treaties.The treaty took many territories from the defeated nations and some territories were very important for the country, because they are the main industry resource. In the treaty of Neuilly, they even took Bulgarias power from the access to the Mediterranean. This point is VERY unfair I think everybody might have access to the sea Perhaps youll think Im very idealist, but I in reality think our world might be MORE fair People might have more rights, the life of people might be more equal They want to weak them as much as they can, that the defeated nations wont be able to attack them again. They are thinking only about their self. They are SO SELFISHIn fact some points of the treaty actually helped to stop the conflict between states, for example the treaty of St Germain. In this treaty Austria was separated from Hungary and many territories of Austria were given away and created as new states, but actually before this treaty, the old Austrian pudding stone had already collapsed in 1918 and many new states had already been set up, so this treaty was only sorting out the conflict between states. This point of the treaty is really not bad, but then many millions in Eastern Europe were given self-determination and freedom to rule themselves. Most of its industry had at peace(p) to Czechoslovakia. Nobody cared about how does this country (Austria) feels, how they think about it. So after this treaty, Austria collapsed and also suffered severe economic problems.All the defeated nations had to disarm and pay reparations. This is really very MEAN The countries that made this treaty thought only about the benefits for them and to squeeze the defeated nations as hard as they can and also of course be sure they wont be able to attack them again. Theyve never thought about what will happen if theyll be the defeated nation, if theyll have to accept this sweet of treaty. Im sure if they are the one of the defeated nations, they wont agree with the treatyFrom all the points, which Ive written down, I give every treaty 5 on the scale of fairness.