Debating Gloalization Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 words

Debating Gloalization - Essay ExampleJoseph Stiglitz is considered as champion of the major voices in the world speaking against the potential detrimental nature of the overall process of globalization. His chief(prenominal) arguments therefore suggest that globalization merchant ship be good if it is executed properly by victorious into the consideration of the individual characteristics of each country. (Friedman, 2002). He is of the opinion that the countries should be allowed to embrace globalization on their avouch terms rather been enforced on them. He to a fault argues that if the pro globalization policies are non being carried out properly, it is quite possible that the countries can become more vulnerable to the external shocks and this can create economic instability as well as resulting into a decline in evolution and increase in poverty. (Stiglitz, 2002). This paper will discuss and explore the ideas of Joseph Stieglitz on globalization and will founder a scathi ng intellectual biography of Joseph Stiglitz. Intellectual Biography Ideas Stiglitz has worked on different issues and presented his ideas on divers(prenominal) range of ideas ranging from economics to political economy. He is often considered as a unfermented Keynesian for his cyphers on the better role of government in running the overall affairs of the economy. He is therefore also considered as neo-liberal thinker because of his strong opposition of the corporate led globalization. He is often considered as critical of IMF and World Bank- two of the most important institutions advocating the globalization and help fulfilling the overall agenda of globalization. (Stiglitz, 2003). His major ideas on globalization are ground on his theory of culture asymmetry and how the lack of correct information can result into the development of incomplete markets at the global level. He is therefore particularly of the view that advocating globalization in such economies where markets are not fully developed and information is not ready(prenominal) can result into more poverty and economic inequality rather than creating prosperity. He is also considered as quite critical of IMF because of its ignorance that the overall process of globalization may not work in the bearing of inadequate institutions as well as the incomplete markets. (Stiglitz, 2003). His ideas on globalization therefore are based on the presence of more transparent institutions and greater role of Western countries in helping the slight developed countries to better integrate themselves into the global economy. His economic ideas are also mostly considered as New Keynesian. Trade In order to understand the Stiglitz ideas on the allay trade and its role in the globalized world, t is important to consider the overall arguments in favor of free trade. The advocates of the globalized and free trade believe that free markets and trade can actually increase the overall opportunity set for the countries and they can readily improvement from this. What is however, important to consider that as per Stiglitz this is not the case? Though he believes that this may be a text book approach however, in reality free trade and markets do not unavoidably result into the growth. The overall arguments are based upon the notion that the free trade and investment can notwithstanding result into the growth when they are competitive. Since the markets of the developing countries are still