Research Critique Part 1 Essay

This paper will critique a soft research theater published in the Journal of Medical morality in 2004, By Dr Helen Aveyard, about how nurses debate patients who d be breast feeding caution procedures. The article explains how nurses view informed bear as not cosmos essential to care for care procedures. Problem StatementThe clinical problem being examined in the research examine is the way in which nurses bring acquiesce prior to administering nursing care procedures, and the way nurses manage patients who refuse any nursing care procedures. By stating that nurses do not discover obtaining consent as an absolute requirement also stating that consent is preferred but no considered essential the significance is established and a clinical problem identified.(Aveyard, 2004, p. 346) The author identifies the wish for further education of nurses on the need to obtain informed consent for nursing care procedures, and the need for more research of this topic. Purpose and Re search QuestionsThe study goly identifies the aim of the study as to examine the way in which nurses manage patients who refuse nursing care procedures.(Aveyard, 2004, p. 346) The study identifies two main purposes for the research study as 1- To examine how consent is obtained prior to nursing care procedures, 2- To explore the slipway in which consent could be approached by clinical nurses.(Aveyard, 2004, p. 347) The author provided clear purpose or aim of the research problem, the way in which nurses manage patients who refuse nursing care procedures.(Aveyard, 2004, p. 346) And related the problem to the questions of how consent is obtained, how obtaining consent can beapproached, and at the extent to which consent remains voluntary. The qualitative method is appropriate for this study as the information needed was obtained with interviews, comments and focus sorts to answer the question of how nurses obtain consent and for exploring ways consent could be approached in the f uture, due to the lack of discussion in nursing literature on obtaining consent prior to nursing care procedures.(Aveyard, 2004, p. 346) belles-lettres ReviewThe author cites qualitative research articles and nursing education manuals and formulation manuals from many different authors and time periods. on that point were no quantitative studies cited. completely research article referenced were relevant to the study, most were greater than sevensome years old and older. No evaluations of strengths or weaknesses were available for referenced material. The limitations of this study were named as data was exploratory, It was not the specific intention to explore the management of the patient who refuses care the topic came from the inductive data analysis.(Aveyard, 2004, p. 349)It is relevant as this is a previously unexplored area of nursing.(Aveyard, 2004, p. 349) The author builds a lawful personal credit line through discussion of nursing education, and the fact that nursi ng education and the focus of informed consent in nursing education is on the nurses role in obtaining consent prior to checkup procedures and research procedures, and not prior to nursing care procedures. The author uses the argument that the lack of discussion on informed consent does not deviate its importance and it purpose which is to protect a patients autonomy .(Aveyard, 2004, p. 346) Conceptual/ a priori Framework.There is no specific perspective identified within this study. There was no diagram or conceptual framework in the study. The results are clearly defined and sample was described as being purposive sample of qualified nurses from two teaching hospitals in England. (Aveyard, 2004, p. 647) The author utilise a grounded theory type of qualitative research study. Through observation of how consent is obtained, nurses interpretations of why consent is obtained, six focus groups, and in discernment interviews, data was collected and canvass. (Aveyard, 2004, p. 347 ) The sampling was purposive, and was said to consist of qualified nurses who were willing-and able- to back away and discuss critical incidents. (Aveyard, 2004, p. 347) The interviews were tape recorded and transcribed focus group and interview data were combined in data analysis and transcripts were analyzed using a constant comparison.(Aveyard, 2004, p. 347)